TCI Free Press

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Press freedom
  • Press conference
  • Press minister
  • Press briefing
  • Press funding

TCI Free Press

TCI Free Press

  • Home
  • Press freedom
  • Press conference
  • Press minister
  • Press briefing
  • Press funding
Press freedom
Home›Press freedom›Beeby: World Press Freedom Day — Applying Canada’s Freedom of Information Law

Beeby: World Press Freedom Day — Applying Canada’s Freedom of Information Law

By Mollie M. Molyneux
May 3, 2022
0
0
Share:

Breadcrumb Links

  1. Opinion
  2. Columnists

The law that is supposed to give Canadians access to federal government records needs some teeth.

In 2008, the National Gallery of Canada alerted the RCMP to an incident in which sensitive government emails about an employee were deliberately deleted. A public servant was fired and Information Commissioner Suzanne Legault advised the Minister of Justice of the probable commission of a crime. The RCMP did not lay any charges. Photo by Tony Caldwell /Postmedia

Content of the article

Like most newborns, the Access to Information Act had no teeth when it came into effect in 1983.

Advertisement 2

This ad has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Content of the article

One section created a fine of $1,000 for obstructing any investigation by the Information Commissioner (which was never imposed). Otherwise, officials who break the law are not subject to any sanctions or penalties. It was like a highway code that imposes speed limits, but without fines, jail time or other consequences. It just invites trouble.

Trouble came quickly. The tainted blood scandal of the 1980s led to the Krever Inquiry. The brutal death of a Somali teenager by soldiers in 1993 led to the Somalia Inquiry. Both investigations revealed that public officials had destroyed, altered, tampered with, lost and withheld key documents.

Freedom of information expert Ken Rubin highlighted other violations in unrelated cases in the 1980s and 1990s. John Grace, then Information Commissioner, proposed in his 1996 annual report -1997 that the law provides for a prison sentence of up to five years for obstructing the right of access.

Advertisement 3

This ad has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Content of the article

A Liberal backbencher decided to do something. In 1997, MLA Colleen Beaumier from Brampton West-Mississauga introduced a private member’s bill. C-208 would impose prison terms of up to two years and fines of up to $10,000 for anyone who deliberately obstructs access.

Colleen Beaumier, then Liberal MP for Brampton West.
Colleen Beaumier, then Liberal MP for Brampton West. n / A

“We must send a strong message that these acts of destruction will not go unpunished,” Beaumier told the House of Commons. She told me later that she got minimal support from then-Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, but Reform Party leader Preston Manning backed the measure. His amendments became law in 1999.

The big stick, however, didn’t make the obstruction problem go away. In 2008, the National Gallery of Canada alerted the RCMP to an incident in which sensitive government emails about an employee were deliberately deleted. A public servant was fired and Information Commissioner Suzanne Legault conducted her own investigation, advising the justice minister of the likely commission of a crime under the Beaumier Amendments.

Advertisement 4

This ad has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Content of the article

After two years, the RCMP dropped their investigation and laid no charges, without explanation.

In 2009, an aide to the Minister of Public Works, Christian Paradis, improperly blocked the release of a document I had requested under the Access to Information Act. Legault’s 2011 report on the incident called it a clear case of political interference. She alerted the Minister of Justice, who called the RCMP. The RCMP dropped its preliminary investigation later in 2011 without any charges or explanation.

Legault investigators found further evidence of interference by Paradis staff in other access requests, but nothing further was referred to the RCMP. To date, no one has ever been charged under the Beaumier Amendments. Its deterrent effect is questionable in light of these seemingly obvious instances of obstruction. Establishing criminal intent apparently sets the bar too high for prosecution.

Advertisement 5

This ad has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Content of the article

Information Commissioner Caroline Maynard: Her orders do not have the legal gravity of a federal court order, so ignoring them does not result in contempt of court charges.  She has used this new power sparingly so far.
Information Commissioner Caroline Maynard: Her orders do not have the legal gravity of a federal court order, so ignoring them does not result in contempt of court charges. She has used this new power sparingly so far. .jpg

In 2019, changes to the law aimed to give it some teeth. The Information Commissioner has been given order-making power, but in a watered-down form. His orders lack the legal gravity of a Federal Court order, for example, so ignoring them does not result in contempt of court charges. She has used this new power sparingly so far. It is too early to judge the impact.

Treasury Board is currently undertaking a statutory review of the Access to Information Act and its administration. Users of the law complain of a “culture of delay” which delays the release of documents (for 80 years in an extreme case). “Participants felt that this culture of delay has become normalized due to a lack of enforcement or the consequences of missing deadlines,” a report on the consultations says. Some groups want administrative fines to be imposed on institutions that do not meet the deadlines set by law.

The Treasury Board review is essentially an inside job, so the officials running it are unlikely to come up with ways to penalize themselves. Instead, we need public-spirited parliamentarians like Beaumier to step up again and give the law some real teeth. And we need an appropriate policing regime to hold to account officials who deliberately violate the existing protections of the law.

Retired journalist from Radio-Canada Dean Beeby is a director of World Press Freedom Canada and an expert on Canadian freedom of information law.

Share this article on your social network

Advertisement 1

This ad has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Ottawa Citizen Logo

Sign up to receive daily news from Ottawa Citizen, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.

By clicking the subscribe button, you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300

Thank you for your registration!

A welcome email is on the way. If you don’t see it, please check your spam folder.

The next issue of Ottawa Citizen Headline News will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered a problem during your registration. Try Again

comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively yet civil discussion forum and encourages all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments can take up to an hour to be moderated before appearing on the site. We ask that you keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications. You will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, if there is an update to a comment thread you follow, or if a user follows you comments. See our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Previous Article

On this World Press Freedom Day, Ukraine ...

Next Article

Opposition MSPs push minister to publish Indyref2 ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Press freedom

    World Press Freedom Day 2022

    April 28, 2022
    By Mollie M. Molyneux
  • Press freedom

    Mexico rejects EU press freedom resolution: ‘We are no longer anyone’s colony’

    March 11, 2022
    By Mollie M. Molyneux
  • Press freedom

    Student press freedom law a ‘critical step’ in defending free speech

    February 10, 2022
    By Mollie M. Molyneux
  • Press freedom

    Press Freedom Ranking Based on National Media Laws, Not Quality: News Veteran Patrick Daniel

    February 17, 2022
    By Mollie M. Molyneux
  • Press freedom

    UNESCO seeks creative partner to develop global campaign for World Press Freedom Day 2022

    December 9, 2021
    By Mollie M. Molyneux
  • Press freedom

    ‘Systematic fear’: How India undermined press freedom in Kashmir | Press Freedom News

    January 26, 2022
    By Mollie M. Molyneux

  • Press conference

    Tottenham live press conference: Antonio Conte on bad defense, Tanganga, transfers and Chelsea

  • Press conference

    Planned Parenthood Holds Press Conference on Stopping Abortion Act of 1931

  • Press minister

    Tamil Nadu Health Minister Threatens Legal Action Against BJP’s Annamalai | Chennai News

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions